And I would ask the gentleman: Today, rather than the Federal Government, States and the private sector, driven by the increased costs of health care, are the engines of change and health care reform. In our State, as you know, California has changed its malpractice law, changed the way insurance can be sold, created voluntary purchasing cooperatives to let the little guy voluntarily achieve the same buying power as large corporations. Our Republican plans build on these reforms. We keep them, and we expand them. The Clinton plan, the plan that you are defending, would outlaw these kinds of changes taking place in the States and force them into a structure dictated by the non-elected national health board that would have the power, in addition to controlling that, of setting and enforcing a national budget for the entire U.S. health system.
William M. Thomas: “And I would ask the gentleman: Today, rather than the Federal Government, States and the private sector, driven by the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing health care reform and contrasting Republican plans with the Clinton plan.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
I believe we have taken an important step towards improving our election process.
I think the usual argument is that, after all, it is a continuation of our current system. I think, as the President said, "That is where most people get their health care now." However, the points the gentlewoman has just made, I think…
as we head toward the House and Senate conference on campaign finance reform, let us remember it is supposed to be for the American people. The American people do not want more of the same with PAC's, and they certainly do not want…
I would say only that we have got to be able to work out some way to continue B. I do not care what threshold screening is put upon the category B, frankly, my school district can meet any level of screening necessary, and we ought not…





