It is geography. But I also pointed out in the letter and to the folks on the committee that the amendment did not block in any way the application of the Endangered Species Act or other laws. I just wanted to keep the option open for building a road in an area that would save the taxpayers money. There was no game-playing on my part. I thought it was a simple addition because of a failure, frankly, to examine in greater detail, the area. It only came to my attention, no question, at the 11th hour. That is why there is only the 1 square mile. I did not offer 100 square miles, I did not offer an area adjacent to the Naval Weapons Center running over several other areas that the road could be built. I talked about 1 square mile.
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to road construction and the Endangered Species Act.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
Saving taxpayer dollars, cutting costs for the regulated community, and ensuring speedier resolution of cases are all a net gain for the voter and our electoral system.
And in addition to that, as the gentlewoman well knows, an employer mandate is forever. The subsidies that make it more enticing to get in there certainly will not be there forever, and it will be an ever-increasing burden. And in addition…
Virtually everyone agrees these reforms would be good for the House and good for the American public.
And beyond that, it is even the kind of company that one decides to form, because under current law, depending upon the way in which you organize your company, you get the benefit or not. If he is self-employed, if he has a proprietorship…





