It is geography. But I also pointed out in the letter and to the folks on the committee that the amendment did not block in any way the application of the Endangered Species Act or other laws. I just wanted to keep the option open for building a road in an area that would save the taxpayers money. There was no game-playing on my part. I thought it was a simple addition because of a failure, frankly, to examine in greater detail, the area. It only came to my attention, no question, at the 11th hour. That is why there is only the 1 square mile. I did not offer 100 square miles, I did not offer an area adjacent to the Naval Weapons Center running over several other areas that the road could be built. I talked about 1 square mile.
William M. Thomas: “It is geography. But I also pointed out in the letter and to the folks on the committee that the amendment did not block…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing an amendment related to road construction and the Endangered Species Act.
Share
More from William M. Thomas
Yes, more than several years ago I testified. I just said, perhaps the gentleman was not on the floor at the time, but I said it became apparent to us when we examined the final iteration of the maps.
These reforms may not make headlines, but they are the most significant legislative changes in the operation of the FEC we have seen in 20 years.
Government housing policies did contribute to the problem. Government tax positions also contributed to the problem.
Mr. Speaker, let me read the Republican segment on the question of the exchange of stamps for cash: A lack of standard procedures and failure to follow USPS regulations may have permitted some Members' personal and campaign offices to…





