On the recordOctober 17, 2011
Do you believe the 2005 critical habitat designation was scientifically justified?
Source
congress.govDo you believe the 2005 critical habitat designation was scientifically justified?
McClintock seeks confirmation on the scientific validity of the 2005 habitat designation.
Share
More from Tom McClintock
Not because of a lack of resources, but because the laws that have been adopted in the 1970s make it cost prohibitive.
Assuming that most people agree that voting in American elections should be the exclusive right of American citizens.
If I'm not able to ask, then there's no data to support. So, we are legally bound in California from asking someone their immigration status under Senate Bill 54.
The proportion of noncitizens who voted was less than 15 percent, but significantly greater than zero.