On the recordFebruary 6, 2012
Would you consider a project that costs $1,600 per acre-foot to be economically attractive?
Source
congress.govWould you consider a project that costs $1,600 per acre-foot to be economically attractive?
McClintock questions the economic viability of a costly project approved by Congress.
Share
More from Tom McClintock
Not because of a lack of resources, but because the laws that have been adopted in the 1970s make it cost prohibitive.
It's not the 'Great Replacement' theory; this is the definition of the 'Great Replacement' fact.
You have sat here too long for any good you have been doing. It is not fit that you should sit here any longer. You shall now give way to better men.