We can change the whole perception of the general public, I think, through trying to come up with a better way.

I think we really don't want to go there, because access is one thing, but fraud is something very different.

Voting is a right, not a use it or lose it privilege.

I withdraw my point of order.

the FEC is a completely failed agency.

the only allegiance of a State's chief election officer must be to the voters and not to any competing political agenda.

an inherent conflict of interest exists when a State's chief election official is responsible for monitoring and certifying the results of a Federal election while actively participating in the campaign of one of the candidates in that…

I have advocated for some time making it impossible for the chief elections official to simultaneously engage in any sort of Federal election activity, and that provision is in H.R. 1.

I think we need to go back a little bit and just think about in H.R. 1 we are concerned about people who are voting in our national elections.

I think even from a sense of entitlement that somebody might be expressing on Twitter, which isn't blatant, I guess I would read that and I would, you know, want to know a little bit more.

I can assure you that we don't have a barrier when we hire someone in our office. We let them know that we are going to take a look at their accounts.

In Oregon, more than 100 years ago, even before the Fair Labor Standards Act was enacted, Oregon became one of the first States to enact a minimum wage.