there really has been nothing that has been stated that questions the ability of people to do this and to have no excuses.
You know what I am wondering here is, what excuse is justified or not justified?
We can change the whole perception of the general public, I think, through trying to come up with a better way.
It is not the small donors that people mistrust; it is the large ones.
I am really kind of shocked by those comments. It is judge and jury by innuendo.
Voting is a right, not a use it or lose it privilege.
So I would urge a 'no' vote.
I just wanted to go back to the question that I asked earlier, if we can think of any excuse that would be acceptable.
Provisional voting is good for robust democracy and encouraging citizens to engage with voting.
I would urge a 'no' vote on this amendment.
I just wanted to--you know, the sense I get of some of these amendments is to really go backwards rather than forward.