If a Member has read--and, of course, I was talking about this Member--over 10 books, traveled Arkansas, spoken to people, and believes that a high public official was and may still be a cocaine addict, do I not have a right to state that publicly on the floor of this House?
Robert Dornan: “If a Member has read--and, of course, I was talking about this Member--over 10 books, traveled Arkansas, spoken to…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing the right to speak about a public official's alleged drug use.
Share
More from Robert Dornan
If I could just have 10 seconds, did you notice the front page of the most truthful paper calls it a curt letter with a small ``c.'' First, I looked and I said, hey, Curt's name should be capitalized here. They meant it was a rather brief…
Thank you. I said Hillary. She is not protected by rule XVIII. Only Mr. Al Gore and Mr. Bill Clinton. Hillary, I can talk about Roger Clinton being a cocaine addict for the next solid hour. I can even quote what he said about his brother…
So title V says it is a Federal failure to control our borders and, therefore, we all want to be merciful, but it is the Federal responsibility.
this is as good a debate as we have had on this House floor in a long, long time, but it is because of the quality of intellectual potency of the two gentlemen on this side of the aisle and some over here. But the gentleman from Ohio [Mr…





