I reject the notion that a vote for this bill is a vote against Shays-Meehan. I believe in Shays-Meehan. I believe in limits on soft money. I think we are all joined in that, and clearly a majority of the Members of the House believe there ought to be limits on soft money. Let us be brutally honest. Shays-Meehan curbs it more directly and more severely. But what the freshman bill does have going for it is a better chance at constitutionality and getting passage in the Senate, and that is why I think we ought to quit arguing among each other and realize that either one of these versions will be a great victory for the American people. We should all be free, those of us that want to limit soft money, of voting for both if we want as a way to check out which one the majority of our Members thinks might have the best chance at final success.
Paul Cook: “I reject the notion that a vote for this bill is a vote against Shays-Meehan. I believe in Shays-Meehan. I believe in…”
On the recordAugust 6, 1998
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing support for a bipartisan campaign finance reform bill during House debate.
Share
More from Paul Cook
Feb 11, 2019
Eliminating or sharply curtailing the ability of tribes to carry out resource extraction and development on tribal lands would be the wrong approach.
Feb 12, 2019
Yes, we have already been pretty public in stating that, for offshore drilling, we believe very firmly the moratorium should be in place.
Mar 13, 2019
The Department of Justice has emphasized making law enforcement in Indian Country a priority because American Indians are victims of violent crimes at rates higher than the general population.
Mar 13, 2019
The trends of high rates of domestic violence against Native women continue, despite the enactment of two major laws since 2010.





