On the recordJune 6, 2013
I believe the $6 billion that was given to California high-speed rail could be better spent on such upgrades as these projects where they are both clearly identified and necessary beyond dispute.
Source
congress.govJeff Denham: “I believe the $6 billion that was given to California high-speed rail could be better spent on such upgrades as these…”
Editor's note · Context
Denham argues for prioritizing infrastructure upgrades over California high-speed rail funding.
Share
More from Jeff Denham
Aug 8, 2018
According to Prop. 1A, this was supposed to create 300,000, I believe, men and women hours through...
Aug 8, 2018
$10.6 billion? And while we are waiting for that funding gap to come in, whatever that new revenue is, will we have high-speed rail on that segment?
Aug 8, 2018
Mr. Kelly, once again here when the original vote was approved as a $33 billion project and we found out just a couple years later it was a $98.5 billion project.
Aug 8, 2018
I think everybody up here voted for the NEPA Reciprocity Act, NEPA/CEQA, so that we could streamline these projects.
Other voices in this conversation
