On the recordAugust 16, 2012
I can appreciate the GSA is finally taking the position that they want to dispose of the property. But when it is just a made-up proposal--I mean, these are just some basic numbers.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Denham criticizes the proposal for the property as unrealistic and based on fabricated numbers.
Share
More from Jeff Denham
Aug 8, 2018
The question the other 49 States ask us when we are talking about funding and whether or not we have more Federal funding is what are you doing yourselves?
Apr 26, 2018
Real quickly, let me just explain what the F4A Denham amendment does. This clarifies the intent of the 1994 FAA bill; thus, how it got its name, the F4A. It created one Federal regulatory standard for meal and rest breaks or hours of…
Apr 26, 2018
Let me just say, Mr. DeFazio has said this is very broad. It is very, very succinct. Title 49, section 31502 is the law. The regulation is 40 CFR 395. This is very, very tight compared to 1994, when the Democrats had control of the House…
Aug 8, 2018
Mr. Kelly, once again here when the original vote was approved as a $33 billion project and we found out just a couple years later it was a $98.5 billion project.
Other voices in this conversation
