I join with the gentleman from Wisconsin in rising to a point of order and also noting the dichotomy in this particular proposal of censure; that if this were to pass, we would go on record as stating that the President deserves censure, but the document itself does not grant censure
Share
More from James Rogan
What a difference a few years makes. In 1993, Republicans were entering their 39th year in the minority in this House. That year was significant because Congress passed on to working people the largest tax increase in American history. The…
A few minutes ago my dear friend from California made commentary in her argument as to why she would vote against articles of impeachment
The largest cut to EPA is a 3 percent cut that the gentleman from Virginia just identified, and I want to read just briefly the type of things that we are seeking this minor reduction in: travel expenses, including uniforms or allowances…
It is wrong, I suggest it is a misreading of the Constitution, for any member here to assert that for a member to vote for an article of impeachment means that the member must be convinced that the President should be removed from office…
Other voices in this conversation
