If there is malpractice associated with that care and you are not in a war zone, then you should be eligible for compensation under the Stayskal Act.

If we say internally in our evaluation of the standard of care is met, then those are the ones that are sent to an external peer review.

The military has an obligation to communicate with the families and the service member who have been injured or there has been a loss of life.

the intention was to recognize that, when you are not in a war zone, when you are at a military medical facility, whether it is in the CONUS or if it is in Europe or if you are on a ship, you should be receiving quality care.

We have got to get this right. Those two results are untenable. I think you appreciate that. I hope that you will redouble your efforts.

However, I am not convinced that the military is delivering on this sacred obligation.

This sizable investment should buy timely, safe, high quality care for our service members and their families.

A simple antibiotic given over a period of 5 to 7 days would have solved the problem, correct?

We are deeply troubled by the events. We are saddened by the loss of Danyelle's life. It was an unnecessary loss of life.

the law, as written today, can't bring justice to Danyelle or me or my wife, but you can make changes

The taxpayers spent more than $50 billion each year on the Military Health System, which provides healthcare services to 9.6 million beneficiaries.

I really commend you in Georgia and Governor Kemp for the innovative proposal that you have offered to try to repurpose some Federal funds to do a better job of taking care of the vulnerable patients in the State and make care more…