Are you not alarmed by the fact that in 43 percent of these cases, that no action was taken, and it met the definition of severe physical abuse?
Jackie Speier
The Public Record
Jackie Speier is a former U.S. Representative from California, serving in the House of Representatives from January 3, 2008, until January 15, 2022. A member of the Democratic Party, she represented California's 14th congressional district. Speier is known for her advocacy on issues such as women's rights, healthcare, and gun control. She gained national attention for her work on the Sexual Assault Survivors' Bill of Rights and her efforts to address military sexual assault. Speier's political career began in the California State Assembly, where she served from 2002 to 2006 before moving to the U.S. Congress.
We wish we had more information in order to actually understand the command actions.
But the first step is that it should be reported to the family advocacy program at the installation level.
But, first, let me welcome our new ranking member to the committee, Congressman Mike Gallagher.
I want to welcome everyone. This is going to be a completely virtual hearing, and we have a very important topic to talk about today.
Good afternoon. My name is Jackie Speier, I chair the Military Personnel Subcommittee, and we are now going to bring this committee hearing to order.
I was very supportive of an amendment that was put into the NDAA to require that women register for Selective Service.
Did AbbVie really need 256 separate and new patents? Did they have 256 new inventions related to Humira?
AbbVie successfully created what the title of the slide suggests, an entire estate of patent protection.
I fear that the NDAA is too late; if we have to wait for the NDAA to provide the funding, that we will have jeopardized many lives.
This was awarded during the final days of the Trump administration, and it smacks of abuse.
Larger contracts often enjoy an unfair advantage over smaller ones, and many have mastered manipulation of safety systems meant to prevent misconduct and abuse.
The U.S. Government is the biggest consumer in the world, spending a record of $228 billion alone in Fiscal Year 2020.
The Feres Doctrine is not law. It is a Supreme Court decision on which we have relied on.
It is offensive to the families who lose their children because of either dereliction of duty or gross negligence.
Based on what has been said by Ms. Maurer from GAO, we either have to decide to build fewer planes or purchase fewer planes or reduce the number of flight hours or reduce the number of requirements.
I think the American taxpayers are asking a very simple question. We spend more money on defense than our peers and near-peers combined.
And do we have any intention to maintain defense contractors in Afghanistan after we depart?