Henry Waxman
The Public Record
Henry Waxman is a former U.S. Representative from California, serving from 1975 to 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, he was known for his work on health care, environmental policy, and consumer protection. During his tenure, Waxman played a key role in the passage of the Affordable Care Act and was a prominent advocate for climate change legislation. He chaired the House Energy and Commerce Committee, where he focused on issues such as tobacco regulation and health care reform.
Congress should not be playing this role. The State Department should evaluate the proposal on its merits, not be ramrodded by Congress into approving a boondoggle for the oil industry.
Some will say we have to make tradeoffs and sacrifice our air quality for lower gas prices, but with this project, we would be sacrificing our air quality for higher gas prices.
True energy security means reducing our oil dependence and moving to cleaner, safer, domestic energy.
What is good for oil companies is not always good for America. That is especially true of this proposal.
This act is a prudent, balanced proposal that recognizes the benefits of permitting the Commission to do its business collectively.
If it is good enough for Congress, the courts, and Holy Mother Catholic Church, it ought to be good enough for the FCC.
This proposed legislation is a modest, commonsense, and much-needed reform to modify the closed-meeting rule.
I want to applaud Congressman Anna Eshoo and Congressman John Shimkus and Congressman Mike Doyle for the introduction of their FCC Collaboration Act.
We should be guided by a few basic questions about each proposed change to ensure that we are promoting smart regulation.
He has sought input from all of the Commissioners and Republican and Democratic committee members, and he is committed to explore proposed process reforms in detail before we proceed toward possible legislation.
Chairman Genachowski should be commended for his significant efforts and commitment to improving agency operations and boosting employee morale.
I hope as this subcommittee moves forward we will try to improve the current process, not turn back the clock.
It is not clear to me that Interior's approach provides any meaningful air quality protection.
If you just devoted more resources to it, would EPA be able to evaluate a permit application, set source-specific air pollution limits, allow for public comment, and provide for administrative review within a 6-month time frame?
The bill sets an extremely tight deadline for issuing an OCS permit, just 6 months before the date a complete application is filed.
If the goal here is really to let Shell and other oil companies get out of Clean Air Act requirements, that is something I would strongly oppose.
If an administrative process is good enough that Shell wants to keep it for its appeals, it is only fair that we keep it for everyone else.
I refuse to believe that we can't address some of the specific problems Shell points to without creating much bigger problems elsewhere.
I think we should make sure that all of these analyses used the best available data and incorporate realistic assumptions.
Production has increased dramatically since that time. Our domestic crude oil production has increased by nearly 300,000 barrels a day.





