This bill relies on an outlandish premise: that EPA's public health and environmental protections provide no benefits at all to the American people.
So it is imperative that we allow the EPA to act as an impartial referee and ensure that the playing field is level for all Americans.
Faced with these facts, opponents of EPA rules now argue that we should simply ignore the benefits and consider only the costs.
The whole idea of this bill is so that the EPA can take a look at it and say, OK, maybe we need to find a less costly way of doing this if i...
The discussion draft is hopelessly flawed. It gives the Department of Energy (DOE) a veto over EPA regulations.
The benefits of most important rules dwarf the costs.
It is not common sense. It is not providing transparency.
This is a bill that we shouldn't be spending our time talking about because it just doesn't make sense even though we are being told it is c...
Regulations delayed could be help to people denied.
There was no precedence for the Clean Air Act in the first place.
I think it is part of the reason that we have this bill, have somebody besides the EPA taking a look at these issues.