to reduce the tax burden on working middle class families we Republicans are proposing a $500 a year tax credit for each child under 18 years old in tax-paying families with income less than $200,000. Using their tired refrain of class warfare, Democrats are calling our proposal a proposal that would benefit only the rich. Let us take a look at the truth. The families of 52,000,000 American children, which comes to 35,000,000 families, are eligible for the $500 per child tax credit. In fact, according to the House Committee on Ways and Means, the family tax credit would lessen the tax burden on a vast majority; in fact, 89 percent of these families. The $500 per child tax credit would completely eliminate the Federal tax burden for 4.7 million working families at the lowest income levels. The bottom line: The contract tax credit will provide families with $120 billion in tax relief over the next 5 years. Just about all families will benefit, the Democrats' class warfare notwithstanding. Family, children, jobs; that is what the Republican tax credit is all about.
Frank Riggs: “to reduce the tax burden on working middle class families we Republicans are proposing a $500 a year tax credit for each…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing a proposed tax credit for families during a floor speech.
Share
More from Frank Riggs
Mr. Chairman, I just again want to, for the benefit of all my colleagues, put matters in perspective in terms of what is taking place in the University of California system. The latest systemwide data released by the University of…
I am very comfortable with language that would say that a court order, Federal court order would take precedence over State and local law with respect to bilingual education or State local policy. But, Mr. Chairman, I cannot support an…
I think someone has to challenge the statement of the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Conyers). Everyone does not do it. And for him to suggest that, I believe, is degrading and insulting. And the point, again, that I wanted to make here on…
I just, first of all, want to thank the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Scott) for what I think is a good-faith decision on his part to raise this issue for debate but perhaps not to pursue an amendment. We disagree on, if you will, the…





