Eric Swalwell

Again, if the President is 100 percent clear, he should also tell his own attorney general, 'Go down to Congress and tell them I'm 100 percent clear so they can understand what the Russians did.'

There are real questions about whether Attorney General Barr is acting as the president's lawyer because of his prior views of the Mueller investigation.

We want to know if the President or anyone in his family is financially compromised not just to the Russians.

The President knows what he did, who his team worked with, and the efforts he took to obstruct.

If the President is 100 percent exonerated, he should just order the full report.

the President could clear all this up.

the fact that they are unwilling to just tell the attorney general to release everything shows a consciousness of guilt.

just because he's not been criminally charged does not mean that there's not wrongdoing or that he didn't rise to the level of conduct that we'd want from a presidential candidate or from someone who's serving in the office.

This is a clarion call for us to see this report immediately.

The Republicans should go with their gut instinct. They voted before anyone knew what the report would show, to release it fully to the public, 420-0, they joined Democrats.

this is not an ordinary citizen. This is the president of the United States, and we should all know especially a public that paid for this investigation what the investigation produced.

we believe in the rule of law, and we believe that there's an honor code in America, which is that you follow a process of traditions and customs.

The Barr letter and his actions demonstrate that he's going to continue to protect the president and it's going to insulate him from us being able to know who he drew it through the election.

But there are thousands and thousands of other people who deserve them, too, and they haven't gotten them.

In our investigation, we saw strong evidence of collusion.

his exercise of the power has been commendable in some instances--yes, that goes back to the celebrity's friend and my constituent, Alice Marie Johnson--

This obsession with a wall, which will be funded at the expense of our military, is heartbreaking to me.

That was an important first step in reasserting Congress' role as a check against President Trump's unlimited appetite for power.

No President should have that kind of unlimited power. That is what is at stake here.

We have an obligation to solve this in a compassionate, humanitarian way, but, again, this is not new, this is not an emergency.

We are turning away asylum seekers at our ports. We are driving them to places that are more treacherous and dangerous.

Today, we tell our fellow Americans that their children's right to learn without fear; that their own right to dance at a concert, worship at a synagogue, shop at the mall; that all those rights to come home, to live, and to love are…

That the President doesn't follow. But have there been discussions about pardons for those individuals that you are aware of, yes or no?

Thank you to Mike Thompson, my colleague, who has continued to believe that we can do better and that we can start with background checks.

After six years, from Sandy Hook to Pulse to Charleston and all the cities we have come to learn, we saw moments of silence followed by moments of inaction.