Eric Swalwell

This is getting a little embarrassing, and it feels a little bit like the 2017 Cleveland Browns.

It's pretty rich to me that Jim Jordan is 400-plus days into being in violation of his own subpoena.

It's about the client that the Law Firm of Insurrection, LLP, Chaired by Jim Jordan, represents: That's Donald Trump.

I think we've had some great testimony here today. But it's not, you know, it's not just--we can't solve it here alone on the Federal level.

So we've got our work cut out for us. As I said, the good news here is there's no partisan excuse.

But I think there's actually broad consensus among both parties about the need for, you know, skill--high-skilled immigration in areas where we just don't have enough American workers.

So I think that being able to communicate that to employers and speaking in their language, saying, you will see the return on your investment by making some of these changes and taking a skilled-based approach to hiring, can go a long way…

The shortage of trained cybersecurity professionals is not a new problem.

Thank you, Chairman Garbarino, Ranking Member Swalwell, and Members of the subcommittee, for your dedication to growing our Nation's cybersecurity talent pipeline.

I think we understand this issue and want to know from you all what we can do together--together inside the Congress and together outside with stakeholders.

Chair, I would seek unanimous consent that my colleague, Yvette Clarke, be allowed to waive on for the purpose of this hearing.

Today we had actual votes on impeaching President Biden, which I think is just thoroughly ridiculous

I don't want to defund you.

In our investigation we saw strong evidence of collusion.

You agree that Russia interfered in the 2016 election?

Did anything in your report prove false that Russians met with Trump's family during the campaign at Trump Tower after an offer of dirt on Hillary Clinton?

You agree Special Counsel Mueller charged dozens of individuals and you indicated three, is that correct?

You had all the power in the world to indict anyone that you had evidence to indict, and you were never blocked from doing it.

President Biden, through the Attorney General, could have had you removed, fired, is that right?

I want to just start by thanking you for your many years of service to our country as a Federal prosecutor.

Did you prove that he didn't say that?

So you have someone who is acting unlawfully and somebody who skips a Congressional subpoena, and we are going to be lectured by the Majority about a dereliction of duty.

I have heard the phrase rule of law and accusations that the Biden administration is sabotaging the rule of law.

I think the lesson here is that this issue is complicated. It involves human beings who are leaving everything.

If you were to think about the migrants who are fleeing the Northern triangle... do you believe that if we were to find a way, as a global alliance, public-private partnerships, to help invest in those countries in their economic…