On the recordMay 7, 2018
That is unacceptable. There is no reason to be testing something that the Navy has been using for 5 years.
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Criticizing the Coast Guard's slow adoption of technology compared to the Navy.
Share
More from Duncan Hunter
May 7, 2018
But, again, you are talking about ScanEagle, which is extremely old technology with hopefully new sensors on it, but this is not groundbreaking, right?
Jul 23, 2018
But they also cut another $700 million past that, and that was mostly going toward shoreside infrastructure?
Mar 13, 2018
But don't spend $18 billion that way. Spend it where it has the most effect, which is the U.S. Coast Guard.
Other voices in this conversation
