I rise today to reluctantly voice my opposition to H.R. 2028, the Pledge Protection Act. As a cosponsor of the original legislation, I am disheartened to see changes that have removed necessary civil rights protections. In the course of a Committee mark up, the original Pledge Protection Act was stripped and rewritten to exclude the Supreme Court from jurisdiction from hearing cases surrounding the Pledge of Allegiance. I strongly believe that if a citizen of the United States has a grievance of a federal nature, that individual deserves his or her day in federal court. By removing the Supreme Court from jurisdiction to hear Pledge cases, the Pledge Protection Act effectively removed a citizen's day in federal court. As such, I can not support this legislation in its current form.
Doug Ose: “I rise today to reluctantly voice my opposition to H.R. 2028, the Pledge Protection Act. As a cosponsor of the original…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the Pledge Protection Act during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Doug Ose
Mr. Speaker, it is October 1, and every October 1 every American wakes up and realizes that it is playoff time. Today we across the country and in the cities fortunate to enough to have teams still participating, those playoffs started. In…
Today, I rise to discuss Mr. Rohrabacher's Amendment (No. 1) to the Water Resources Development Act of 2003 (H.R. 2557). This amendment is well intended since it seeks to find a way to provide additional funds for needed port security…
I just want to refresh everybody's memory about what happened in 2000 and 2001 and to point out the empirical fact that there have been no statewide blackouts or brownouts in California since, frankly, the Republican-dominated FERC got put…
I think the gentleman from Alabama started out very accurately reflecting the broad consensus on 90 percent of this bill, and I think he closed here just this moment with a very eloquent case as to why we need to stop the free rider…





