I just wanted to confirm the long title, because it appears today that we are talking about this bill being about energy independence. And earlier, during the rule debate, it was brought up by the distinguished chairwoman of the Rules Committee, who referred to the process that was used under the last Congress, referring to Mr. Dreier's process, as being dishonest. Mr. Speaker, this whole process that we are going through today is about dishonesty, and I want to be clear that I am talking about the process. This is unacceptable to me. Because if this is about energy independence, this bill we are going to pass today, then why is there this quote this morning in the Wall Street Journal, and I will read the quote. ``Tomorrow we finish our 100 hours and I will talk about what comes next. And included in that is energy independence.'' Ms. Pelosi made this statement in the Wall Street Journal this morning. So are we debating today about energy independence? We are going to pass this bill about energy independence, or is this going to be something that we are going to do after this? If so, then something about this process is dishonest. I don't know if this bill is about energy independence or, as the Speaker said, in the future we are going to talk about energy independence. I thought this bill was about energy independence. So I hope for the rest of this debate that the majority will clarify this, because I don't understand what this is about.
Devin Nunes: “I just wanted to confirm the long title, because it appears today that we are talking about this bill being about energy…”
Editor's note · Context
Addressing concerns about the honesty of the legislative process regarding a bill on energy independence.
Share
More from Devin Nunes
I thank the gentleman for the time. Since the election of President Trump, the most absurd conspiracy theories have been proclaimed as gospel by the entire Democratic Party and their media mouthpieces. Let's begin with the Russian…
I claim the time in opposition to the amendment, although I am not opposed to the amendment. The Acting CHAIR. Without objection, the gentleman from California (Mr. Nunes) is recognized for 5 minutes. There was no objection.
We are not here to run a show trial in an effort to impeach the President of the United States. It is clear that, since the Democrats took control of the House of Representatives, they have always intended to transform the Intelligence…
Just a couple of comments for some of my colleagues who I know are concerned that this doesn't go far enough. One of the concerns they have is that there is an ongoing investigation led by the U.S. attorney out of Connecticut, and there is…





