one of the reasons why I was very much in opposition to it was because it specifically was drafted in a way that would prevent one of our most affordable projects from being expanded, which is Shasta Reservoir
David Valadao: “one of the reasons why I was very much in opposition to it was because it specifically was drafted in a way that would…”
Editor's note · Context
Valadao opposed the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill due to its impact on Shasta Reservoir expansion.
Share
More from David Valadao
I oppose this amendment. Many of my colleagues are highly frustrated by the way the attending physician managed the COVID pandemic here in Washington. I am one of them. I understand, but I do not agree that decreasing the funds of the…
I thank the gentleman from Arizona for yielding. I also thank Leader Scalise for his time today. We have a historic opportunity to advance the key priorities of this administration with a one-bill solution, and I fully agree we need to…
I oppose this amendment as written. The amendment would prohibit the use of all Architect of the Capitol electric vehicles and equipment, which are used for facility and ground maintenance activities. For example, the Capitol Visitor…
Again, I think it is important to remind folks at home watching that these are all-electric vehicles in the building. So for the 33,000 people who required shuttle assistance to get around the Capitol, elderly and disabled people who…





