10/28/2013
https://congress.gov...
"doesn't Congress have an obligation, along with the State of California I might say, to look at ICANN and say, you know, ICANN is making a ton of money, they seem to be in the operation of making a to..."
"My question is that if we assume that ICANN exists for the public benefit... is there any reason cost-wise that these names would have to cost more than $10 a year?"
"If we assume for a moment that the charter of ICANN is or should be the interest of commerce--in other words, a fiduciary obligation to promote commerce, not to enrich themselves, or even enrich peopl..."
"Isn't that correct?"