The very act of Federal dollars being used to stifle that speech is, in fact, historically what we would consider an indictment against the First Amendment protection.
Darrell Issa: “The very act of Federal dollars being used to stifle that speech is, in fact, historically what we would consider an…”
Editor's note · Context
Issa argues that federal funding to suppress speech violates First Amendment rights.
Share
More from Darrell Issa
South Korea is an American ally and an economic success story, which is why its recent and continuing actions restricting American companies — like its 20-year ban on Google Maps — are so troubling.
We live in a sanctuary city area--Los Angeles and San Diego. We live in a sanctuary State.
We're seeing that South Korea has adopted the European digital rules which are very much designed to localize rather than accept the great companies that have spread very well around the world because they've earned it.
South Korea is still an important strategic partner, but their last election led to a left-wing government closely aligned with China that, among other things, has begun attacking American companies.





