the bill is well intended, even if it is fatally flawed. People are talking about 10 years of wanting to achieve what they hope to achieve here today. I would say to you and certainly would ask that Federal workers take note of what we do here today. We are not talking about making sure that someone who has a child or adopts a child has the opportunity to take the time off for bonding. We already ensure 12 weeks of that and have for that decade. We are not talking here about anything except as it is presently written and not allowed to be amended, a bill that simply grants 4 weeks every single year to those individuals who choose to have a child, who choose to take time off in relation to a sick Federal employee, as was originally presented, or, more importantly, someone who takes on a foster child. Now I am all for people taking on foster children, but let's look at this from a practical standpoint.
Darrell Issa: “the bill is well intended, even if it is fatally flawed. People are talking about 10 years of wanting to achieve what…”
On the recordJune 19, 2008
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of a bill related to leave for Federal employees.
Share
More from Darrell Issa
Sep 5, 2024
Yesterday we also introduced to the House of Representatives the Sanctuary City Accountability Act.
Jan 8, 2026
a lot can be said about my friend and colleague, my Western Caucus chair, but today was a special day for us. We had lunch today as California members, and Doug paid for it because every week somebody sponsors it. His death was so sudden…
Apr 8, 2025
As I close, since the ranking member so aptly named a couple of famous quotes and famous movies, I might call attention to the line: What we have here is a failure to communicate. The other side, just a few months ago, supported this…





