The chairman, who I have had a good working relationship with, made the point that this passed out of committee without anything left unresolved. And to a certain extent I would agree with him. Except of course we didn't have a score on this. We never do. We didn't know what this bill was going to cost. And when we discovered that this was going to cost millions of dollars every year, we made it clear before the last round of a request for a vote that we would have to find an offset or we would have to modify the bill to ensure that it would not cause the taxpayers to look at this as simply a perk for government. Because ultimately we can talk about morale, but the Federal workforce makes on the average $60,000 more than their private-sector counterparts. So morale should already be good in an organization the size of the government that has added a quarter of a million new workers since we went into a recession. There is no question that telework can justify this if it's done properly.
Darrell Issa: “The chairman, who I have had a good working relationship with, made the point that this passed out of committee without…”
Editor's note · Context
Speaker Issa discusses concerns about the costs and implications of a telework bill for federal employees.
Share
More from Darrell Issa
Congratulations to @pulte on his appointment by @realDonaldTrump as the new Acting Director of National Intelligence. Bill has successfully managed some of the most sensitive American data, as well as more than $10 trillion in assets at…
I can hold this seat. I’m not quitting on California and neither should anyone else.
I mean, they kept counting until they won. What’s new about that? We have a corrupt system.
South Korea is an American ally and an economic success story, which is why its recent and continuing actions restricting American companies — like its 20-year ban on Google Maps — are so troubling.





