Mr. Speaker, I note that what the gentlewoman from Colorado (Ms. Boebert) is referring to is what has now been affirmed as an inaccurate decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. My colleagues on the other side, in disparaging the President, keep using the word ``illegal.'' I ask that my Democratic Colleagues really reconsider. The minority may disagree with the executive actions of the President. From time to time, the court may disagree. Yet, in fact, not only are his actions not illegal, but they are well within the reach of what any President might well do in trying to defend the United States from enemies, foreign and domestic. We can disagree about the meaning of a law that has been on the books for 225 years. We should not disparage the motives or the actions of the chief executive simply because we disagree. Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Share & report
More from Darrell Issa
My federal workers are also taxpayers, and even if they may want to preserve their job, they’ll be the first to tell me that they’re tired of going to a post office with surly attitudes, bad delivery and nothing to show for it.
Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H.R. 8666. The SPEAKER pro tempore. Is there objection to the request of the…
Yes, Mexico is our ally but Mexico is an ally that violates international law by allowing these people to come in without visas.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Madam Speaker, this is, in fact, a good, commonsense reform that has come from the gentleman from Alabama (Mr. Strong), who has shepherded this bill. At this time, I yield such time…





