On the recordMay 14, 2013
There was a quid pro quo. There was a trade of $180 million worth of revenue to the American people in return for dropping a case that your Justice Department did not want to go before the High Court.
Source
congress.govDarrell Issa: “There was a quid pro quo. There was a trade of $180 million worth of revenue to the American people in return for…”
Editor's note · Context
Issa accuses the Justice Department of trading a significant case to avoid Supreme Court involvement.
Share
More from Darrell Issa
Jul 7, 2026
We're seeing that South Korea has adopted the European digital rules which are very much designed to localize rather than accept the great companies that have spread very well around the world because they've earned it.
Jul 24, 2025
For decades, the clear Constitutional rights of law-abiding gun owners have been targeted for elimination, and handgun rosters are only one of the cynical schemes used to undermine the Second Amendment through the pretense of firearm…
Jun 5, 2026
Congratulations to @pulte on his appointment by @realDonaldTrump as the new Acting Director of National Intelligence. Bill has successfully managed some of the most sensitive American data, as well as more than $10 trillion in assets at…
Other voices in this conversation
