On the recordJuly 18, 2012
Do you remember, in these over 100 witnesses, them being interested in eliminating safety or somehow rolling back the health and protection in any of their complaints on regulations even once?
Source
congress.govDarrell Issa: “Do you remember, in these over 100 witnesses, them being interested in eliminating safety or somehow rolling back the…”
Editor's note · Context
Darrell Issa questions if witnesses ever wanted to compromise safety in their regulatory complaints.
Share
More from Darrell Issa
Apr 8, 2025
I note that what the gentlewoman from Colorado (Ms. Boebert) is referring to is what has now been affirmed as an inaccurate decision by the U.S. Supreme Court. My colleagues on the other side, in disparaging the President, keep using the…
Dec 12, 2024
We often hear the term ``country before party'' here in the House and throughout our country. It is clear we didn't hear that here yet today on the other side of the aisle. Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman…
Sep 9, 2024
There are laws for a reason, and we have safety for those reasons. When you don't enforce the laws, safety is no longer in existence.
Apr 8, 2025
I include in the Record the CBO estimate for this bill. H.R. 1526, NORRA OF 2025 AS REPORTED BY THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY ON MARCH 25, 2025 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ By fiscal year…
Other voices in this conversation
