The phoniest argument against missile defense that I know is that we should not build it because it will never work. Well, who would advocate building a system that does not work? If it does not work, it will not be built. The fact is that no one on this side of the aisle or either side of the aisle who believes in missile defense would ever consider building a system that did not work. But the major decision we have to make is if we can build a system that works, should we build it? And those people who are opposing the missile defense system, they do not want to face that argument. They just want to say it will not work, and, then, again, brush it away in an arrogant manner.
Dana Rohrabacher: “The phoniest argument against missile defense that I know is that we should not build it because it will never work.…”
On the recordNovember 6, 2001
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the arguments for and against missile defense systems.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Dec 12, 2018
I join my colleagues in singing the praise of our staff. But let me just note--and, of course, I have had great staff as well, Rick Dykema and Kathleen Staunton, who have been with me the entire 30 years that I have been a Member of this…
Sep 27, 2018
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.
Sep 26, 2018
We need to now show in the age that we are in exactly how this is going to have an impact--positive impact on the United States because we are borrowing that money from our grandchildren.





