the purpose of this hearing is not to debate science, whether or not what is taking place is part of a natural cycle, or whether it can be traced to the human production of CO2.
Dana Rohrabacher: “the purpose of this hearing is not to debate science, whether or not what is taking place is part of a natural cycle, or…”
Editor's note · Context
Rohrabacher emphasizes the hearing's focus on Arctic policy, not climate change debate.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
I join my colleagues in singing the praise of our staff. But let me just note--and, of course, I have had great staff as well, Rick Dykema and Kathleen Staunton, who have been with me the entire 30 years that I have been a Member of this…
Shame on them. Shame on them, and I would hope that, Mr. Chairman, that they're listening right now.
Today, I rise with a sense of awe and gratitude that God and the voters have permitted me to be a Member of this body, the House of Representatives, for the last 30 years. At least for me, my time here has permitted me the opportunity to…
we should be changing the policy so that this doesn't happen like this again.





