The purpose of this hearing is not to debate science, whether or not what is taking place is part of a natural cycle, or whether it can be traced to the human production of CO2.
Dana Rohrabacher: “The purpose of this hearing is not to debate science, whether or not what is taking place is part of a natural cycle, or…”
Editor's note · Context
Rohrabacher emphasizes the hearing's focus on Arctic policy, not climate change debate.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Maybe the people of these countries--for example, Hungary or elsewhere, when they see us getting involved with trying to push various policies and issues with the NGOs, et cetera, in their country, maybe they see it as the same kind of…
Ignoring the issue results in disastrous effects on long-term residential neighborhoods, and fuels an increase of abuse in--of the protected class.
I mean, Ukraine, we've spent $1 billion in Ukraine, I guess, in the last couple years and everybody acknowledges the level of corruption there is just dramatic.
Yes, thank you much, Chairman King, Ranking Member Cohen, and other members of the subcommittee.





