The fundamental rules that were laid down 200 years ago on the very subject, for example, not just the confidentiality, which they are trying to destroy, but the subject that you brought up is first to file, versus the concept that we had in our system for over 200 years, which is that we respect the person who is the first to invent. Inventors have told me over and over again that if we change our system, and, by the way, in Europe and Japan that is the way their systems are, and, of course, they don't protect the little guy. Their systems were designed at a time when they weren't talking about individual rights, but were trying to protect corporate interest in their country. But first to file would flood our system with patent applications day after day after day. The large corporations who can afford to make a new filing every time there is a little step forward, you would end up flooding the system, as compared to what it is today. Talk about delays in the patent system. It would have a horrible impact.
Dana Rohrabacher: “The fundamental rules that were laid down 200 years ago on the very subject, for example, not just the confidentiality…”
On the recordSeptember 5, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of changing the U.S. patent system from 'first to invent' to 'first to file'.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Sep 25, 2018
We need to be--make sure that the Muslim population of the world knows that we are not against their religion.
Sep 26, 2018
Maybe the people of these countries--for example, Hungary or elsewhere, when they see us getting involved with trying to push various policies and issues with the NGOs, et cetera, in their country, maybe they see it as the same kind of…
Sep 25, 2018
What we seem to be having now and what you're describing is that the Chinese Government is going through another period where it is clamping down in order to stamp out those forces in society, especially those containing religion like the…





