Obviously, if we just listen very closely to what is being said here, these gentlemen are trying to cut off other avenues for ordinary Americans to raise money for their campaigns, leaving the political arena in the control of such wealthy Americans that every Member of this body who is not rich shudders at the thought of having a wealthy candidate in their district step forward and pump so much money in that he or she will be eliminated just because they just cannot raise the money in small increments. The Shays-Meehan supposed reform is making this problem worse, and by not accepting this amendment, I am afraid that they are disclosing themselves at just how effective they think their own bill is going to be.
Dana Rohrabacher: “Obviously, if we just listen very closely to what is being said here, these gentlemen are trying to cut off other…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing campaign finance reform during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Well, thank you, Mr. Meeks. I have a few questions of my own. But let me note that we are spending $833 billion more this year than we are taking in.
That type of deficit spending has to be dealt with in some way and one way will be to increase the productivity of our economy.
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.
I understand you're not making a profit on this project now, and I think that is a factor that is going to try to influence people to try to make the right decisions.





