Let's note that there are several amendments that were not permitted by the Rules Committee. I did not submit amendments because those of us who have been following this bill realize it is fundamentally flawed. The purpose of the bill is to support those large corporations that Ms. Kaptur noted who are dramatically supporting the legislation. And it is being opposed, I might add, by a large number of universities, unions, pharmaceutical industries, biotech industries, et cetera, et cetera. So we have everybody except the electronics industry and the financial industry, who are already over in China making their profit at our expense, are opposed to the bill.
Dana Rohrabacher: “Let's note that there are several amendments that were not permitted by the Rules Committee. I did not submit amendments…”
On the recordSeptember 7, 2007
Source
govinfo.govEditor's note · Context
Discussing opposition to a bill and its support from large corporations.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Sep 25, 2018
But the people--the Uyghurs and the people of China should get the message that we are willing.
Sep 27, 2018
Under normal circumstances this problem would be addressed by local government.
Sep 27, 2018
Let me start by thanking the thousands of firefighters who, each year, put their lives at risk to battle wildfires like those that have plagued California and other western States. We owe it to them, as well as to the American people, to…
Sep 27, 2018
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.





