Mr. Chairman, I am afraid I am going to have to reject the idea of putting a waiver into this bill. The bottom line is when we put waivers into these bills, what we do is we are really making them into a sense-of-the-Congress resolution and not changing a darned thing. If we are here to do anything, let us change some things. Let us get down to some real policy decisions and assert the fact that the Congress of the United States should be here protecting the interests of the people of the United States. The McKinney amendment had some real teeth in it and meant something about human rights and democracy. This amendment has something to do really with the security interest of the United States. What we are saying is that there is a threshold over which the Russians have passed, over that threshold that we can no longer tolerate and continue to give them millions upon millions, $95 million in aid to the Russians. It is unacceptable if we are going to give them that kind of aid for them to transfer weapons that are aimed at murdering, at killing American soldiers and American sailors.
Dana Rohrabacher: “Mr. Chairman, I am afraid I am going to have to reject the idea of putting a waiver into this bill. The bottom line is…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing a waiver in a bill related to U.S. aid to Russia during a House committee discussion.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
I understand you're not making a profit on this project now, and I think that is a factor that is going to try to influence people to try to make the right decisions.
I don't think that we should look to our young people and give them an example of being eight times over budget and twice as long in cost overruns.
The way I handle this as chairman I usually let people finish their train of thought.
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…





