Dana Rohrabacher: “The President was taking both sides of every issue.”

The way I handle this as chairman I usually let people finish their train of thought.

I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.

Isn't it somewhat presumptuous of us to go in and then to actually take more of that $833 billion that we are spending in deficit to go in to try to help them--push them in certain directions, even though they already have a democratically…

Can we still afford to do that and why should we do that if they already have a democratically elected government?