If the Federal Government is mandating the actions and priorities of the States, no wonder the people of California and the State government of California are unable to put themselves into a position of preparing for a crisis and have to come to the Federal Government, when their own moneys are being mandated and how they will spend their own moneys is being mandated by the Federal Government. Shouldn't we leave that decisionmaking, shouldn't we let people in the States be able to make decisions that are most applicable to the States, so if there is an emergency they can then afford to take care of those problems?
Dana Rohrabacher: “If the Federal Government is mandating the actions and priorities of the States, no wonder the people of California and…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of federal mandates on state decision-making and crisis preparedness.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Ignoring the issue results in disastrous effects on long-term residential neighborhoods, and fuels an increase of abuse in--of the protected class.
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…
Yes, thank you much, Chairman King, Ranking Member Cohen, and other members of the subcommittee.
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.





