I oppose this amendment still, but understand my colleague's desire in this attempt. But I would oppose it, because, number one, I do disagree with his theory on labor practices, as is happening in the Northern Marianas; and, number two, I would think we should make sure if we have reached an agreement with the Northern Mariana Islands and it takes a certain amount of money to fulfill that agreement, that we keep that in the budget so we can fulfill our pledge, rather than trying to do other things. There are many other things we can do with this money that we can argue are very beneficial to the people of the United States, but we made an agreement with these people and we should keep it. So I oppose the amendment.
Dana Rohrabacher: “I oppose this amendment still, but understand my colleague's desire in this attempt. But I would oppose it, because…”
Editor's note · Context
Opposing an amendment related to labor practices and funding for the Northern Mariana Islands.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Under normal circumstances this problem would be addressed by local government.
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.
The way I handle this as chairman I usually let people finish their train of thought.
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…





