I am informed there has been no communication from the university this year, and that this was not presented to our subcommittee, nowhere along the line. If this is such an important project and this is so justifiable, why was not an amendment presented to us at the subcommittee so we could go through the procedures and it could be talked out, so people up and down through the system would have their chance to have a say and to vote on this? Why do we have to have it just appear all of a sudden on the floor at the last minute?
Dana Rohrabacher: “I am informed there has been no communication from the university this year, and that this was not presented to our…”
Editor's note · Context
Questioning the lack of communication regarding a project during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.
Ignoring the issue results in disastrous effects on long-term residential neighborhoods, and fuels an increase of abuse in--of the protected class.
I mean, Ukraine, we've spent $1 billion in Ukraine, I guess, in the last couple years and everybody acknowledges the level of corruption there is just dramatic.
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…





