Mr. Speaker, we have heard here that this really is not about taxpayer subsidy, because what we are doing today only makes possible that we will give taxpayer subsidies to American businessmen for closing factories here and opening up in this dictatorship in Southeast Asia, Vietnam. The fact is, that is what this debate is all about, whether or not it should be permitted for American companies to receive these subsidies from the American taxpayer that are not in the interest of the American people so that they can go over and manufacture things in Vietnam and then to export them back to the United States. That is what this is about, the same way it is about this in China in our China debate, and what the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Crane) read confirms that.
Dana Rohrabacher: “Mr. Speaker, we have heard here that this really is not about taxpayer subsidy, because what we are doing today only…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing taxpayer subsidies for American companies operating in Vietnam.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Shame on them. Shame on them, and I would hope that, Mr. Chairman, that they're listening right now.
But the people--the Uyghurs and the people of China should get the message that we are willing.
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.
Isn't it somewhat presumptuous of us to go in and then to actually take more of that $833 billion that we are spending in deficit to go in to try to help them--push them in certain directions, even though they already have a democratically…





