That is really an important distinction, and certainly, the Court did not mandate that they take steps to take the CO2 out of energy production, did they, or did they say that has to be considered but they didn't say they have to do it?
Dana Rohrabacher: “That is really an important distinction, and certainly, the Court did not mandate that they take steps to take the CO2…”
On the recordOctober 28, 2013
Source
congress.govEditor's note · Context
Rohrabacher emphasizes the distinction in the Court's ruling on EPA's regulation of greenhouse gases.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Jul 24, 2018
We should be changing the policy so that this doesn't happen like this again.
Sep 26, 2018
Well, thank you, Mr. Meeks. I have a few questions of my own. But let me note that we are spending $833 billion more this year than we are taking in.
Sep 25, 2018
We need to be--make sure that the Muslim population of the world knows that we are not against their religion.
Nov 28, 2018
Today, I rise with a sense of awe and gratitude that God and the voters have permitted me to be a Member of this body, the House of Representatives, for the last 30 years. At least for me, my time here has permitted me the opportunity to…





