one of the issues that seems to be at the heart of one of the discussions going on here today is whether or not the terrorism which we are condemning in this resolution, which I support wholeheartedly, is intentional, which we understand, but whether or not those actions on the part of the Israeli Government which result in the death of noncombatants, whether that is just collateral damage. The gentleman has been in the Middle East many times and knows many of the players. From a firsthand point of view, does the gentleman believe that the damage that is being done to noncombatants by the Israeli army is unintentional?
Dana Rohrabacher: “one of the issues that seems to be at the heart of one of the discussions going on here today is whether or not the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the implications of Israeli military actions on noncombatants in the context of a resolution condemning terrorism.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
Well, thank you, Mr. Meeks. I have a few questions of my own. But let me note that we are spending $833 billion more this year than we are taking in.
That type of deficit spending has to be dealt with in some way and one way will be to increase the productivity of our economy.
What we seem to be having now and what you're describing is that the Chinese Government is going through another period where it is clamping down in order to stamp out those forces in society, especially those containing religion like the…
It made it less likely, and this President, with all of his abrasiveness and all of the way that he gets people angry at him, calling the guy 'Rocket Man' and things like that, we have made tremendous strides forward at least getting the…





