As far as I am concerned, that is not a legitimate part of the debate, although we hear it time and time again expressed. The fact is we are talking about the current trade status. Now, those who are opposed to my resolution accurately say that we are not talking about most-favored-nation status because it sounds like it is something more than our current trade status, but what I am suggesting is our current trade status is immoral, it is wrong both economically and strategically for the United States; in other words, that it does not benefit the United States to have the current trade status.
Dana Rohrabacher: “As far as I am concerned, that is not a legitimate part of the debate, although we hear it time and time again…”
Editor's note · Context
Debating the implications of U.S. trade policy toward China.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
First and foremost, before I get into the subject that I will be discussing today, let me just note that ``American made'' is only important if there are Americans actually in the jobs. Who is the friend and who is the enemy of American…
But the people--the Uyghurs and the people of China should get the message that we are willing.
Today, I rise with a sense of awe and gratitude that God and the voters have permitted me to be a Member of this body, the House of Representatives, for the last 30 years. At least for me, my time here has permitted me the opportunity to…
We need to be--make sure that the Muslim population of the world knows that we are not against their religion.





