Should we then have a U.S. ambassador in Uzbekistan if they have thousands of political prisoners?
Dana Rohrabacher: “Should we then have a U.S. ambassador in Uzbekistan if they have thousands of political prisoners?”
Editor's note · Context
Rohrabacher questions the rationale for U.S. diplomatic presence in light of political prisoners in Uzbekistan.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
That type of deficit spending has to be dealt with in some way and one way will be to increase the productivity of our economy.
Shame on them. Shame on them, and I would hope that, Mr. Chairman, that they're listening right now.
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.
First and foremost, before I get into the subject that I will be discussing today, let me just note that ``American made'' is only important if there are Americans actually in the jobs. Who is the friend and who is the enemy of American…





