Keeping Saddam Hussein in power might have been the best deal for our national security.
Dana Rohrabacher: “Keeping Saddam Hussein in power might have been the best deal for our national security.”
Editor's note · Context
Rohrabacher suggests that maintaining Saddam's regime could have been better for U.S. security interests.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
I mean, Ukraine, we've spent $1 billion in Ukraine, I guess, in the last couple years and everybody acknowledges the level of corruption there is just dramatic.
Yes, thank you much, Chairman King, Ranking Member Cohen, and other members of the subcommittee.
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.
Congressman Rohrabacher's H.R. 5724, Restoring Community Oversight of Sober Living Homes Act of 2018 is the second bill in two years attempting to clarify local control to come to the Judiciary Committee.





