as a young reporter, I remember the debate over the Alaskan pipeline. I remember it very vividly. I remember the hysteria and the charges and the warnings of the catastrophe, oh, the environmental catastrophe that would happen; and the caribous were going to quit breeding and all of those other dire consequences we would face. None of them came true. But do my colleagues know what happened? We won that vote by 1 vote, 1 vote in the Senate. Because we had that pipeline, America has received 25 percent of its oil, domestic oil production through that pipeline. If we had not had that oil, our people would have lived at a much lower standard of living, we would not have been helped out during the crises that we faced. What kind of crises are we going to face in the future? This 2 percent might help us out. We should make sure we can use it for the benefit of our people, keeping them prosperous and at peace.
Dana Rohrabacher: “as a young reporter, I remember the debate over the Alaskan pipeline. I remember it very vividly. I remember the…”
Editor's note · Context
Discussing the impact of the Alaskan pipeline on U.S. oil production and living standards.
Share
More from Dana Rohrabacher
I would hope that we would get some support from these leaders who have been appointed by President Trump to protect the American people in any way they can. Having these airplanes sit on the tarmac in California and elsewhere throughout…
I understand you're not making a profit on this project now, and I think that is a factor that is going to try to influence people to try to make the right decisions.
I remember, like, one of the things when I first got here was the Clinton administration's insistence on spending what was the equivalent of $50 million providing fuel for North Korea, and it had just the opposite impact.





