I rise to express my grave reservations about the rule proposed for consideration of H.R. 1. Although I strongly support the Congressional Accountability Act, and although I believe it was wise of the new leadership to bring up substantially the same bill that was overwhelmingly approved by the House of Representatives last August, I strongly disapprove of the manner in which the majority has proposed considering this legislation. I understand the desire of the new Republican leadership to bring the Congressional Accountability Act to the floor today, to fulfill the promise made in the ``Contract With America.'' But voting on a major piece of legislation on the very day it is introduced, without having an opportunity to amend it is simply the wrong way to legislate--and Members on the other side of the aisle know that. In fact, our Republican colleagues have chastised Democratic members, more times than we would like to remember, for speeding bills to the floor before there had been adequate opportunity to review them, and for not allowing amendments to be offered to them. ``Gag rule'' was the term our Republican friends used to describe rules like the one before us now.…
Editor's note · Context
Expressing concerns about the legislative process for the Congressional Accountability Act.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
I rise in opposition to all four proposals for amending the Constitution to balance the Federal budget. I share the feelings of frustration which have led many of our colleagues to conclude that amending our Constitution is our only hope…
Mr. Speaker, we strongly oppose this modified closed rule for the bill designating English as the official language of the Government of the United States and requiring that most official business be conducted only in English. We believe…
I support the rule and urge my colleagues to do the same. Unfortunately, except for the unfunded mandates legislation the major pieces of legislation that have been considered on the House floor this year have had restricted rules. We…
Mr. Speaker, we oppose this rule, and we oppose the measure that it makes in order, the conference report on Interior appropriations for fiscal year 1996. The rule waives all points of order against the conference report and against its…





