I rise in opposition to all four proposals for amending the Constitution to balance the Federal budget. I share the feelings of frustration which have led many of our colleagues to conclude that amending our Constitution is our only hope for solving the Federal Government's persistent budget deficit problem. The enormous deficits the Government has run for the last decade and a half are, without a doubt, the leading policy and political failure of our generation. They are the root cause of the low rate of investment in this country, and they are a major factor in our inability to respond to our Nation's most pressing needs. They are also a large part of the reason why voters are angry at Congress and why so many feel that our political process just does not work. But amending the Constitution to require a balanced budget is the wrong way to attempt to correct the imbalance between spending and revenues. The right way to do it is to enact well-thought-out spending cuts and revenue increases which reduce our annual deficits, but which do so gradually, in a way that avoids inflicting damage on a fragile economy. That is what the President and Congress did successfully last year, and it is what we should continue to do in the years ahead. The proposals before us, however, would deter us from acting in such a responsible manner in the future.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing proposals to amend the Constitution for a balanced budget during a House floor debate.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
the amendment I am offering addresses the most fundamental challenge facing current and future generations: the alarming rate of human population growth, which underlies virtually every environmental, developmental, and national security…
the amendment Mr. Berman, Mr. Condit, Mrs. Thurman, and I are offering addresses the serious burden placed on States and localities by the Federal Government's abdication of responsibility for the incarceration of criminal aliens. This…
I will conclude my inquiries, if I may, sir, by asking whether this is a unique or even unusual parliamentary situation? Because it seems to me, Mr. Speaker, that so far in the 104th Congress, we are in this situation on almost every rule…
Mr. Speaker, we oppose the closed process that would make in order consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 1833, the so-called and misnamed partial-birth abortion ban. This is a bill that on the pretense of seeking to ban certain…





