Mr. Speaker, we oppose the closed process that would make in order consideration of the Senate amendments to H.R. 1833, the so-called and misnamed partial-birth abortion ban. This is a bill that on the pretense of seeking to ban certain vaguely defined abortion procedures is, in reality, an assault on the constitutionally guaranteed right of women to reproductive freedom and on the freedom of physicians to practice medicine without Government intrusion. Those of us, Mr. Speaker, who fought for many, many years to secure, and then to preserve and protect, the right of every woman to choose a safe medical procedure to terminate a wanted pregnancy that has gone tragically wrong, and when her life or health are endangered, are deeply troubled by the legislation before us today and by the rule under which it is being considered.
Editor's note · Context
Opposing the closed process for considering Senate amendments to the partial-birth abortion ban.
Share
More from Anthony Beilenson
But we urge a no vote on the previous question. If the previous question is defeated, I shall offer an amendment to the rule which would make in order a new section in the rule. The provision would direct the Committee on Rules, as the…
Mr. Speaker, although many of us believe that the so-called Truth in Budgeting Act that would be made in order by this rule is an irresponsible piece of legislation, we have no objections to the rule itself. It is the first open rule the…
I am, however, as are others, concerned about the wisdom of the provisions of H.R. 666, the bill for which this rule has been granted. As my colleagues on the Judiciary Committee have written, H.R. 666 "commits affirmative harm to the…
Mr. Speaker, we support the rule which, as my colleague and friend on the Committee on Rules has pointed out, waives all points of order against the conference report and is necessary because the conferees added new material not included…





