I was unable to be present during rollcall vote No. 368 on July 24, 2018. Had I been present, on rollcall vote No. 368, I would have voted ``no.'' The SPEAKER pro tempore. The question is on the resolution. The question was taken; and the…

I know what I voted on. Obviously, I voted no.

I think it is important to examine what is standing in the way, why are we not making headway, especially in rural areas.

I come from local government, like you, Ms. Craig, and I really have a reverence for local government.

This is a very important hearing. When at least a third of our country is either underserved or not served in the second decade of the 21st century, that is a major issue for our country.

I think this hearing, most frankly, is being held under disingenuous pretenses, and that the majority is inaccurately portraying itself as champions of consumer privacy reform when the record shows otherwise.

that's why my legislation, H.R. 6071, codifies the intent of the program in order to eliminate confusion.

Congress is responsible for having wiped out privacy protections for the American people, period.

The BROWSER Act does nothing meaningful for real privacy.

The FTC doesn't have what it needs to enforce a darn thing, in my view.

Consumers legitimately feel that they have completely lost control of their personal information.

The only action the majority has taken on privacy to date has been to actively roll back existing privacy protections and expose consumers to increased harm.