Mark Pryor
The Public Record
Mark Pryor is an American politician who served as a United States Senator from Arkansas from 2003 to 2015. A member of the Democratic Party, he focused on issues such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure during his tenure. Pryor was known for his moderate stance and worked across party lines on various legislative initiatives. He was re-elected in 2008 but lost his bid for a third term in 2014, marking the end of his Senate career.
I think there are two versions of the thought: the one that you have described very well, that there is an element of the television experience that is about discovery.
Thank you. And I want to thank the panel. You guys have been outstanding and very informative.
I think we have our profound doubts that aa la carte would actually deliver a lower-cost product to the American consumer.
Let me say as a predicate, if there is any misunderstanding, the NAB supports the voluntary spectrum auction.
I believe, of course, and I think you all mentioned that there are several Senators on the Committee and subcommittee that have large areas of rural constituents in their states.
Somehow, if you want to support localism, please remember the two revenue streams that provide for it and pay those costs: advertising and retransmission consent.
AUSN was pleased to see that the bill was introduced earlier this year by Senator Mark Pryor (D-AR)
I remain very concerned about milk pricing and have joined with Senator Kirsten Gillibrand of New York to introduce the Dairy Price Reform Act of 2013.
But basically, the article points out that the administration at USDA made certain decisions that maybe maximized claimants chances of receiving a settlement and that there possibly was fraud and fraudulent tactics on the parts of the…
Let me start with the SNAP program. Obviously, SNAP is nearly an $80 billion program, which is the largest single USDA program.
S. 629 would authorize Veteran status under Title 38 for Guard and Reserve members of the Armed Forces
I think that it's very important for soft diplomacy that we continue to keep this program here.
We need to move on to the second panel at this point, but I do have some questions about the Dale Bumpers Small Farms Center. I do not support the closing of that center.
I'm open to sitting down with you and others, and talking about ways that we can reform it.
And for my last question, I want to have some questions for the record as well, but for my last question, I'd like to ask about a sensitive subject at USDA, because USDA has had some problems in this area of civil rights over the years.
I think you're taking five grant programs and consolidating them into one. I love that concept, and I think we would all like to know more detail, why you're doing this and how much you think you can save and how that efficiency is going…
I do have a concern about some agencies as they reduce staff, might the program integrity suffer.





